Re: subscriptioncheck failure

From: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>
To: vignesh C <vignesh21(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>, David Pirotte <dpirotte(at)gmail(dot)com>, Euler Taveira <euler(at)timbira(dot)com(dot)br>
Subject: Re: subscriptioncheck failure
Date: 2021-05-14 05:30:14
Message-ID: YJ4K5uZi9pc8pivV@paquier.xyz
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Thu, May 13, 2021 at 07:05:55PM +0530, vignesh C wrote:
> Thanks for the comments, Please find the attached patch having the changes.

Cool, thanks for the new version. I have spent some time
understanding the initial report from Amit as well as what you are
proposing here, and refactoring the test so as the set of CREATE/ALTER
SUBSCRIPTION commands are added within this routine is a good idea.

I would have made the comment on top of setup_subscription a bit more
talkative regarding the fact that it may reuse an existing
subscription, but that's a nit. Let's wait for Amit and see what he
thinks about what you are proposing.
--
Michael

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Michael Paquier 2021-05-14 05:37:02 Re: Support for VACUUMing Foreign Tables
Previous Message Dilip Kumar 2021-05-14 05:27:34 Re: OOM in spgist insert