Re: [PATCH] force_parallel_mode and GUC categories

From: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, Justin Pryzby <pryzby(at)telsasoft(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] force_parallel_mode and GUC categories
Date: 2021-04-14 04:54:34
Message-ID: YHZ1ipDBc4jaVNAX@paquier.xyz
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers pgsql-performance

On Tue, Apr 13, 2021 at 10:12:35AM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> The following parameters are intended for developer testing, and
> should never be enabled for production work. However, some of
> them can be used to assist with the recovery of severely
> damaged databases.

Okay, that's fine by me.
--
Michael

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Yuya Watari 2021-04-14 05:11:45 Re: Performance Evaluation of Result Cache by using TPC-DS
Previous Message Kyotaro Horiguchi 2021-04-14 04:41:47 Re: TRUNCATE on foreign table

Browse pgsql-performance by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Michael Paquier 2021-04-14 06:57:21 Re: [PATCH] force_parallel_mode and GUC categories
Previous Message Andres Freund 2021-04-14 03:48:16 Re: LWLocks by LockManager slowing large DB