Re: Simplify backend terminate and wait logic in postgres_fdw test

From: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>
To: Bharath Rupireddy <bharath(dot)rupireddyforpostgres(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>, Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)oss(dot)nttdata(dot)com>
Subject: Re: Simplify backend terminate and wait logic in postgres_fdw test
Date: 2021-04-13 07:39:58
Message-ID: YHVKzork+QvH29fX@paquier.xyz
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Mon, Apr 12, 2021 at 11:29:28AM +0530, Bharath Rupireddy wrote:
> I changed to 5min. If at all there's any server that would take more
> than 5min to remove a process from the system processes list, then it
> would see a warning on timeout.

Looks fine to me. Let's wait a bit first to see if Fujii-san has any
objections to this cleanup as that's his code originally, from
32a9c0bd.
--
Michael

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Julien Rouhaud 2021-04-13 08:06:25 Re: Feature improvement: can we add queryId for pg_catalog.pg_stat_activity view?
Previous Message Krzysztof Kois 2021-04-13 07:36:33 Unresolved repliaction hang and stop problem.