Re: Table refer leak in logical replication

From: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>
To: Amit Langote <amitlangote09(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com>, "houzj(dot)fnst(at)fujitsu(dot)com" <houzj(dot)fnst(at)fujitsu(dot)com>, "pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>, "shiy(dot)fnst(at)fujitsu(dot)com" <shiy(dot)fnst(at)fujitsu(dot)com>, "tanghy(dot)fnst(at)fujitsu(dot)com" <tanghy(dot)fnst(at)fujitsu(dot)com>, Masahiko Sawada <sawada(dot)mshk(at)gmail(dot)com>
Subject: Re: Table refer leak in logical replication
Date: 2021-04-21 03:18:14
Message-ID: YH+ZdsyujSVU03U3@paquier.xyz
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Wed, Apr 21, 2021 at 11:13:06AM +0900, Amit Langote wrote:
> Agree about adding tests along these lines. Will post in a bit.

Thanks!
--
Michael

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Michael Paquier 2021-04-21 03:27:12 Re: PATCH: Add GSSAPI ccache_name option to libpq
Previous Message Michael Paquier 2021-04-21 03:11:45 Re: Tiny update to pg_stat_statements documentation