| From: | Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz> |
|---|---|
| To: | Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org>, Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, Dagfinn Ilmari Mannsåker <ilmari(at)ilmari(dot)org>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: multi-install PostgresNode |
| Date: | 2021-03-29 02:04:24 |
| Message-ID: | YGE1qMRKz98Kgexh@paquier.xyz |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Thu, Mar 25, 2021 at 09:23:22AM +0100, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> On 25.03.21 04:47, Michael Paquier wrote:
>> This would imply an installation with some fancy --bindir or --libdir
>> specified in ./configure. Never say never, but I also think that what
>> has been committed is fine.
>
> /usr/lib64/? /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/? Seems pretty common.
As part of the main PostgreSQL package set, yes, things are usually
mixed. Now, when it comes to the handling of conflicts between
multiple major versions, I have yet to see installations that do not
use the same base path for the binaries and libraries, and the PGDG
packages do that with /usr/pgsql-NN/. So, I doubt that we are going
to need this amount of control in reality, but I may be wrong, of
course :)
--
Michael
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Kyotaro Horiguchi | 2021-03-29 02:09:00 | Re: wal stats questions |
| Previous Message | Michael Paquier | 2021-03-29 01:57:00 | Re: Allow matching whole DN from a client certificate |