Re: Improvements and additions to COPY progress reporting

From: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>
To: Matthias van de Meent <boekewurm+postgres(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Justin Pryzby <pryzby(at)telsasoft(dot)com>, Bharath Rupireddy <bharath(dot)rupireddyforpostgres(at)gmail(dot)com>, Tomas Vondra <tomas(dot)vondra(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Josef Šimánek <josef(dot)simanek(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Improvements and additions to COPY progress reporting
Date: 2021-03-05 06:00:14
Message-ID: YEHI7rLWguM+QQrH@paquier.xyz
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Thu, Mar 04, 2021 at 05:45:50PM +0100, Matthias van de Meent wrote:
> Sure, I'm convinced. PFA the patchset with this change applied.

0002 looks fine to me, and in line with the discussion, so applied.
--
Michael

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Julien Rouhaud 2021-03-05 06:05:22 Re: Shared memory size computation oversight?
Previous Message Jaime Casanova 2021-03-05 05:58:47 Re: SQL-standard function body