| From: | Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz> |
|---|---|
| To: | Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Daniel Gustafsson <daniel(at)yesql(dot)se>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: OpenSSL 3.0.0 compatibility |
| Date: | 2021-03-04 08:15:05 |
| Message-ID: | YECXCZYuYiGCkAhL@paquier.xyz |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, Mar 03, 2021 at 02:55:41PM +0100, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> This thread is still in the commit fest, but I don't see any actual proposed
> patch still pending. Most of the activity has moved into other threads.
>
> Could you update the status of this CF entry, and perhaps also on the status
> of OpenSSL compatibility in general?
3.0.0 has released an alpha 12 on the 18th of February, so their stuff
is not quite close to GA yet.
I have not looked closely, but my guess is that it would take a couple
of extra months at least to see a release. What if we just waited and
revisited this stuff during the next dev cycle, once there is at least
a beta, meaning mostly stable APIs?
Daniel, what do you think?
--
Michael
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Kyotaro Horiguchi | 2021-03-04 08:17:15 | Re: PITR promote bug: Checkpointer writes to older timeline |
| Previous Message | Kyotaro Horiguchi | 2021-03-04 08:10:36 | Re: PITR promote bug: Checkpointer writes to older timeline |