Re: doc review for v14

From: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>
To: Justin Pryzby <pryzby(at)telsasoft(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)gmail(dot)com>
Subject: Re: doc review for v14
Date: 2021-02-24 07:18:51
Message-ID: YDX924cg0EKAgW8v@paquier.xyz
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Mon, Feb 22, 2021 at 02:03:45AM -0600, Justin Pryzby wrote:
> Rebased, with a few additions.

Thanks. I have done a pass through this series, and applied most of
this stuff with a backpatch for the doc portions.

+ The status of each kind of extended statistics is shown in a column
+ named after the "kind" (e.g. Ndistinct).
+ NULL means that it doesn't exist. "defined" means that it was requested
From 0009, there is a grammar mistake on HEAD here, but I don't
understand what you mean by "kind" here. Wouldn't it be better to not
use quotes and just refer to "its type of statistics"?

0016 was missing some <command> markups.

This leaves 0003, 0004, 0005, 0010, 0012, 0018, 0020 and 0021 as these
did not look like improvements after review.
--
Michael

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Justin Pryzby 2021-02-24 07:39:55 Re: doc review for v14
Previous Message Masahiko Sawada 2021-02-24 07:16:34 Re: Single transaction in the tablesync worker?