On Tue, Mar 02, 2021 at 07:46:21AM -0500, David Steele wrote:
> That summarizes the process very well.
Okay.
> My concern here is that we appear to have a partial page write as the first
> write to a page after the backup start checkpoint. At least, that's what
> this error seems to be indicating from my reading of the code.
>
> The question is -- are there valid circumstances under which this might be
> happening or is it a bug?
Err, what you are doing here is qualified as unorthodox, but isn't
"unsupported" a better term? That's basically tricking WAL replay
into doing something it would never have to do for physical backups.
--
Michael