Re: doc review for v14

From: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>
To: Justin Pryzby <pryzby(at)telsasoft(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)gmail(dot)com>
Subject: Re: doc review for v14
Date: 2021-03-02 01:57:13
Message-ID: YD2befDAiOGmG6h/
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Mon, Mar 01, 2021 at 03:17:40PM +0900, Michael Paquier wrote:
> You could say here "Checksums can be enabled", but "normally" does not
> sound bad to me either as it insists on the fact that it is better to
> do that when the cluster is initdb'd as this has no downtime compared
> to enabling checksums on an existing cluster.

I looked at that again this morning, and the last version sent
upthread still looked fine to me, so I have just applied that.

Thanks for caring about that, Justin.

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Amit Langote 2021-03-02 02:18:46 Re: simplifying foreign key/RI checks
Previous Message Masahiko Sawada 2021-03-02 01:43:08 Re: [BUG] Autovacuum not dynamically decreasing cost_limit and cost_delay