| From: | Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz> |
|---|---|
| To: | Justin Pryzby <pryzby(at)telsasoft(dot)com> |
| Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Subject: | Re: doc review for v14 |
| Date: | 2021-03-02 01:57:13 |
| Message-ID: | YD2befDAiOGmG6h/@paquier.xyz |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Mon, Mar 01, 2021 at 03:17:40PM +0900, Michael Paquier wrote:
> You could say here "Checksums can be enabled", but "normally" does not
> sound bad to me either as it insists on the fact that it is better to
> do that when the cluster is initdb'd as this has no downtime compared
> to enabling checksums on an existing cluster.
I looked at that again this morning, and the last version sent
upthread still looked fine to me, so I have just applied that.
Thanks for caring about that, Justin.
--
Michael
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Amit Langote | 2021-03-02 02:18:46 | Re: simplifying foreign key/RI checks |
| Previous Message | Masahiko Sawada | 2021-03-02 01:43:08 | Re: [BUG] Autovacuum not dynamically decreasing cost_limit and cost_delay |