Re: Support for NSS as a libpq TLS backend

From: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>
To: Daniel Gustafsson <daniel(at)yesql(dot)se>
Cc: Jacob Champion <pchampion(at)vmware(dot)com>, "hlinnaka(at)iki(dot)fi" <hlinnaka(at)iki(dot)fi>, "pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>, "andrew(dot)dunstan(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com" <andrew(dot)dunstan(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, "thomas(dot)munro(at)gmail(dot)com" <thomas(dot)munro(at)gmail(dot)com>, "andres(at)anarazel(dot)de" <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, "sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net" <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>
Subject: Re: Support for NSS as a libpq TLS backend
Date: 2021-02-10 07:23:24
Message-ID: YCOJ7P6yfrvrbaY/
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Tue, Feb 09, 2021 at 10:30:52AM +0100, Daniel Gustafsson wrote:
> It can be, it's not the most pressing patch scope reduction but everything
> helps of course.

Okay. I have spent some time on this one and finished it.

> Thanks. That patch is slightly more interesting in terms of reducing scope
> here, but I also think it makes the test code a bit easier to digest when
> certificate management is abstracted into the API rather than the job of the
> testfile to perform.

That's my impression. Still, I am wondering if there could be a
different approach. I need to think more about that first..

In response to


Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Amit Langote 2021-02-10 07:30:26 Re: Parallel INSERT (INTO ... SELECT ...)
Previous Message Michael Paquier 2021-02-10 07:17:31 Re: pg_cryptohash_final possible out-of-bounds access (per Coverity)