Re: progress reporting for partitioned REINDEX

From: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>
To: Justin Pryzby <pryzby(at)telsasoft(dot)com>
Cc: Matthias van de Meent <boekewurm+postgres(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org, Anastasia Lubennikova <a(dot)lubennikova(at)postgrespro(dot)ru>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Subject: Re: progress reporting for partitioned REINDEX
Date: 2021-02-19 06:06:04
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Thu, Feb 18, 2021 at 02:17:00PM +0900, Michael Paquier wrote:
> I have no issues with documenting more precisely on which commands
> partitions_total and partitions_done apply currently, by citing the
> commands where these are effective. We do that for index_relid for
> instance.

Please find attached a patch to do that. Justin, what do you think?

Attachment Content-Type Size
reindex-progress-doc.patch text/x-diff 905 bytes

In response to


Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Michael Paquier 2021-02-19 06:10:53 Re: Printing LSN made easy
Previous Message Michael Paquier 2021-02-19 05:37:06 Re: cryptohash: missing locking functions for OpenSSL <= 1.0.2?