| From: | Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz> |
|---|---|
| To: | Justin Pryzby <pryzby(at)telsasoft(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Matthias van de Meent <boekewurm+postgres(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org, Anastasia Lubennikova <a(dot)lubennikova(at)postgrespro(dot)ru>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
| Subject: | Re: progress reporting for partitioned REINDEX |
| Date: | 2021-02-19 06:06:04 |
| Message-ID: | YC9VTOnbOi8i87Te@paquier.xyz |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Thu, Feb 18, 2021 at 02:17:00PM +0900, Michael Paquier wrote:
> I have no issues with documenting more precisely on which commands
> partitions_total and partitions_done apply currently, by citing the
> commands where these are effective. We do that for index_relid for
> instance.
Please find attached a patch to do that. Justin, what do you think?
--
Michael
| Attachment | Content-Type | Size |
|---|---|---|
| reindex-progress-doc.patch | text/x-diff | 905 bytes |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Michael Paquier | 2021-02-19 06:10:53 | Re: Printing LSN made easy |
| Previous Message | Michael Paquier | 2021-02-19 05:37:06 | Re: cryptohash: missing locking functions for OpenSSL <= 1.0.2? |