Re: Support for NSS as a libpq TLS backend

From: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>
To: Jacob Champion <pchampion(at)vmware(dot)com>
Cc: "daniel(at)yesql(dot)se" <daniel(at)yesql(dot)se>, "hlinnaka(at)iki(dot)fi" <hlinnaka(at)iki(dot)fi>, "pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>, "andrew(dot)dunstan(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com" <andrew(dot)dunstan(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, "thomas(dot)munro(at)gmail(dot)com" <thomas(dot)munro(at)gmail(dot)com>, "sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net" <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>, "andres(at)anarazel(dot)de" <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>
Subject: Re: Support for NSS as a libpq TLS backend
Date: 2021-01-28 06:06:32
Message-ID: YBJUaMj1EdpWVCgb@paquier.xyz
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Wed, Jan 27, 2021 at 06:47:17PM +0000, Jacob Champion wrote:
> So to check understanding: the `openssl` config variable is still alive
> for MSVC builds; it just turns that into `--with-ssl=openssl` in the
> fake CONFIGURE_ARGS?

Yeah, I think that keeping both variables separated in the MSVC
scripts is the most straight-forward option, as this passes down a
path. Once there is a value for nss, we'd need to properly issue an
error if both OpenSSL and NSS are specified.

> Since SSL is an obsolete term, and the choice of OpenSSL vs NSS vs
> [nothing] affects server operation (such as cryptohash) regardless of
> whether or not connection-level TLS is actually used, what would you
> all think about naming this option --with-crypto? I.e.
>
> --with-crypto=openssl
> --with-crypto=nss

Looking around, curl has multiple switches for each lib with one named
--with-ssl for OpenSSL, but it needs to be able to use multiple
libraries at run time. I can spot that libssh2 uses what you are
proposing. It seems to me that --with-ssl is a bit more popular but
not by that much: wget, wayland, some apache stuff (it uses a path as
option value). Anyway, what you are suggesting sounds like a good in
the context of Postgres. Daniel?
--
Michael

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Peter Smith 2021-01-28 06:18:35 Re: Single transaction in the tablesync worker?
Previous Message Joel Jacobson 2021-01-28 05:52:12 Re: [HACKERS] GSoC 2017: Foreign Key Arrays