| From: | Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Euler Taveira <euler(at)eulerto(dot)com>, Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)oss(dot)nttdata(dot)com>, katsuaki(dot)fukushima(at)gmail(dot)com, pgsql-bugs(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org, peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com |
| Subject: | Re: BUG #16854: initdb fails on ReFS and FAT32 file systems |
| Date: | 2021-02-06 01:18:31 |
| Message-ID: | YB3uZ4RKXX12uD1n@paquier.xyz |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-bugs |
On Fri, Feb 05, 2021 at 12:01:51PM -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
> But given that, I'm content to say "you can use ReFS if you have
> a version that supports hard links". We don't need to support
> work-in-progress filesystems.
Yeah, agreed. I think that it could be interesting to get a buildfarm
animal in place that supports such a configuration if users care about
that? If not, we are going to have a hard time tracking down issues
in the WIN32 port.
--
Michael
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | PG Bug reporting form | 2021-02-06 07:46:14 | BUG #16856: Crash when add "_RETURN" rule on child table |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2021-02-05 17:01:51 | Re: BUG #16854: initdb fails on ReFS and FAT32 file systems |