Re: ResourceOwner refactoring

From: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>
To: Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnaka(at)iki(dot)fi>
Cc: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org>, "kuroda(dot)hayato(at)fujitsu(dot)com" <kuroda(dot)hayato(at)fujitsu(dot)com>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: ResourceOwner refactoring
Date: 2021-01-21 04:14:12
Message-ID: YAj/
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Thu, Jan 21, 2021 at 12:11:37AM +0200, Heikki Linnakangas wrote:
> Summary: In the the worst scenario, the patched version is still 24% slower
> than unpatched. But many other scenarios are now faster with the patch.

Is there a reason explaining the sudden drop for numsnaps within the
[10,60] range? The gap looks deeper with a low numkeep.

In response to


Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Greg Nancarrow 2021-01-21 04:16:18 Re: Parallel INSERT (INTO ... SELECT ...)
Previous Message Noah Misch 2021-01-21 04:07:41 Re: pg_upgrade fails with non-standard ACL