Re: Generating code for query jumbling through gen_node_support.pl

From: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>
To: Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
Cc: Postgres hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>, "Drouvot, Bertrand" <bdrouvot(at)amazon(dot)com>
Subject: Re: Generating code for query jumbling through gen_node_support.pl
Date: 2023-01-25 00:08:17
Message-ID: Y9By8XDuaLHLNpY0@paquier.xyz
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Tue, Jan 24, 2023 at 03:57:56PM +0900, Michael Paquier wrote:
> Makes sense. That would be my intention if 0004 is the most
> acceptable and splitting things makes things a bit easier to review.

There was a silly mistake in 0004 where the jumbling code relied on
compute_query_id rather than utility_query_id, so fixed and rebased as
of v7 attached.
--
Michael

Attachment Content-Type Size
v7-0003-Support-for-automated-query-jumble-with-all-Nodes.patch text/x-diff 68.5 KB
v7-0004-Add-GUC-utility_query_id.patch text/x-diff 12.0 KB

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Kyotaro Horiguchi 2023-01-25 00:11:51 Re: Time delayed LR (WAS Re: logical replication restrictions)
Previous Message Michael Paquier 2023-01-25 00:02:46 Re: 011_crash_recovery.pl intermittently fails