Re: Make use of assign_checkpoint_completion_target() to calculate CheckPointSegments correctly

From: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>
To: Bharath Rupireddy <bharath(dot)rupireddyforpostgres(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Make use of assign_checkpoint_completion_target() to calculate CheckPointSegments correctly
Date: 2023-01-19 04:16:50
Message-ID: Y8jEMgNmezpZPPyf@paquier.xyz
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Tue, Jan 17, 2023 at 07:55:53PM +0530, Bharath Rupireddy wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 17, 2023 at 12:31 PM Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz> wrote:
>> Oops. It looks like you are right here. This would impact the
>> calculation of CheckPointSegments on reload when
>> checkpoint_completion_target is updated. This is wrong since we've
>> switched to max_wal_size as of 88e9823, so this had better be
>> backpatched all the way down.
>>
>> Thoughts?
>
> +1 to backpatch as setting checkpoint_completion_target will not take
> effect immediately.

Okay, applied down to 11. I have double-checked the surroundings to
see if there was a similar mistake or something hiding around
CheckpointSegments but noticed nothing (also did some primary/standby
pgbench-ing with periodic reloads of checkpoint_completion_target,
while on it).
--
Michael

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Ankit Kumar Pandey 2023-01-19 05:22:00 Re: Todo: Teach planner to evaluate multiple windows in the optimal order
Previous Message Karl O. Pinc 2023-01-19 04:05:33 Re: doc: add missing "id" attributes to extension packaging page