Re: Beautify pg_walinspect docs a bit

On Thu, Jan 12, 2023 at 05:29:39PM +0530, Bharath Rupireddy wrote:
> As discussed [1], here's a patch to beautify pg_walinspect docs
> similar to pageinspect docs. The existing pg_walinspect docs calls out
> the column names explicitly and then also shows them in the function
> execution examples which is duplicate and too informative. Also \x
> isn't used so some of the execution outputs are out of indentation.
>
> Thoughts?

Thanks, this looked basically fine, so applied. I have tweaked a few
sentences while reviewing the docs, while on it. I have decided to
remove the example where we specify per_record=true for
pg_get_wal_stats(), as it does not bring much value while bloating the
whole, and the parameter is clearly documented.
--
Michael