Re: mprove tab completion for ALTER EXTENSION ADD/DROP

From: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>
To: vignesh C <vignesh21(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Kyotaro Horiguchi <horikyota(dot)ntt(at)gmail(dot)com>, mths(dot)dev(at)pm(dot)me, pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: mprove tab completion for ALTER EXTENSION ADD/DROP
Date: 2023-01-11 23:52:13
Message-ID: Y79LrRLHgK5vroag@paquier.xyz
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Wed, Jan 11, 2023 at 10:29:25PM +0530, vignesh C wrote:
> I too felt keeping it simpler is better. How about using the simple
> first version of patch itself?

Okay, I have just done that, then, after checking that all the object
types were covered (28). Note that PROCEDURAL LANGUAGE has been
removed for simplicity.
--
Michael

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Jeff Davis 2023-01-11 23:52:26 Re: Rework of collation code, extensibility
Previous Message Jeff Davis 2023-01-11 23:43:48 Re: Rework of collation code, extensibility