Re: Allow +group in pg_ident.conf

From: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>
To: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>
Cc: Jelte Fennema <me(at)jeltef(dot)nl>, Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Allow +group in pg_ident.conf
Date: 2023-01-11 01:14:45
Message-ID: Y74NhVT9jcVG/Njn@paquier.xyz
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Tue, Jan 10, 2023 at 09:42:19AM -0500, Andrew Dunstan wrote:
> Ok, that sounds reasonable, but the cfbot doesn't like patches that
> depend on other patches in a different email. Maybe you can roll this up
> as an extra patch in your next version? It's pretty small.

This can go two ways if both of you agree, by sending an updated patch
on this thread based on the other one.. And actually, Jelte's patch
has less C code than this thread's proposal, eventhough it lacks
tests.
--
Michael

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Joseph Koshakow 2023-01-11 01:34:15 Re: Infinite Interval
Previous Message Nathan Bossart 2023-01-11 01:08:36 delay starting WAL receiver