| From: | Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz> |
|---|---|
| To: | Ian Lawrence Barwick <barwick(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Bharath Rupireddy <bharath(dot)rupireddyforpostgres(at)gmail(dot)com>, bt22nakamorit <bt22nakamorit(at)oss(dot)nttdata(dot)com>, Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)oss(dot)nttdata(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: ps command does not show walsender's connected db |
| Date: | 2022-11-22 00:44:43 |
| Message-ID: | Y3wbe2dnxh9B4fLF@paquier.xyz |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Thu, Nov 17, 2022 at 01:32:11PM +0900, Ian Lawrence Barwick wrote:
> Fujii-san is marked as committer on the commifest entry for this patch [1];
> are you able to go ahead and get it committed?
That's the state of the patch since the 11th of October. Seeing the
lack of activity, I propose to take care of that myself if there are
no objections, only on HEAD. That could be qualified as a bug, but
that does not seem worth bothering the back-branches, either. Except
if somebody has a different opinion?
The patch looks to do the job correctly, still I would leave the extra
printf() calls in BackendStartup() out.
--
Michael
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Fujii.Yuki@df.MitsubishiElectric.co.jp | 2022-11-22 01:01:55 | RE: Partial aggregates pushdown |
| Previous Message | Nathan Bossart | 2022-11-22 00:41:19 | wake up logical workers after ALTER SUBSCRIPTION |