Re: pg_basebackup's --gzip switch misbehaves

From: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>
To: Daniel Gustafsson <daniel(at)yesql(dot)se>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: pg_basebackup's --gzip switch misbehaves
Date: 2022-11-16 01:02:04
Message-ID: Y3Q2jJ1THADGFZG5@paquier.xyz
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Tue, Nov 15, 2022 at 11:09:54AM +0100, Daniel Gustafsson wrote:
>> On 15 Nov 2022, at 00:58, Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz> wrote:
>>
>> On Mon, Nov 14, 2022 at 03:27:14PM +0100, Daniel Gustafsson wrote:
>>> Ugh, yes, that's what it should say.
>>
>> A split sounds fine by me. On top of what Tom has mentioned, I have
>> spotted two small-ish things.
>>
>> - This module is available from CPAN or an operating system package.
>> + This module is available from
>> + <ulink url="https://metacpan.org/release/IPC-Run">CPAN</ulink>
>> + or an operating system package.
>>
>> It looks like there is a second one in install-windows.sgml.
>
> Not sure I follow. IPC::Run is already linked to with a ulink from that page
> (albeit with an empty tag rendering the URL instead).

Ah, I did not notice that there was already a link to that with
IPC::Run. Anyway, shouldn't CPAN be marked at least as an <acronym>
if we are not going to use a link on it? acronyms.sgml lists it, just
saying.

> A related nitpick I found though is that metacpan has changed their URL
> structure and these links now 301 redirect. The attached 0001 fixes that first
> before applying the other part.

WFM.
--
Michael

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andres Freund 2022-11-16 01:12:35 Re: Slow standby snapshot
Previous Message Michael Paquier 2022-11-16 00:56:07 Re: Unit tests for SLRU