Re: Unit tests for SLRU

From: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>
To: Pavel Borisov <pashkin(dot)elfe(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Aleksander Alekseev <aleksander(at)timescale(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>, Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Maxim Orlov <orlovmg(at)gmail(dot)com>, Noah Misch <noah(at)leadboat(dot)com>, Daniel Gustafsson <daniel(at)yesql(dot)se>
Subject: Re: Unit tests for SLRU
Date: 2022-11-16 00:56:07
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Tue, Nov 15, 2022 at 02:43:06PM +0400, Pavel Borisov wrote:
> I've looked through the patch again. I agree it looks better and can
> be committed.
> Mark it as RfC now.

Okay, applied, then. The SQL function names speak by themselves, even
if some of them refer to pages but they act on segments, but that's
easy enough to see the difference through the code when we do segment
number compilations, as well.

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Michael Paquier 2022-11-16 01:02:04 Re: pg_basebackup's --gzip switch misbehaves
Previous Message Tom Lane 2022-11-16 00:46:26 Re: Slow standby snapshot