Re: Unit tests for SLRU

From: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>
To: Pavel Borisov <pashkin(dot)elfe(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Aleksander Alekseev <aleksander(at)timescale(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>, Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Maxim Orlov <orlovmg(at)gmail(dot)com>, Noah Misch <noah(at)leadboat(dot)com>, Daniel Gustafsson <daniel(at)yesql(dot)se>
Subject: Re: Unit tests for SLRU
Date: 2022-11-10 08:17:46
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Thu, Nov 10, 2022 at 04:01:02PM +0900, Michael Paquier wrote:
> I have looked at what you have here..

The comment at the top of SimpleLruInit() for sync_handler has been
fixed as of 5ca3645, and backpatched. Nice catch.

In response to


Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bharath Rupireddy 2022-11-10 08:33:29 Re: [PATCH] Teach pg_waldump to extract FPIs from the WAL
Previous Message Michael Paquier 2022-11-10 08:16:22 Re: Avoid overhead open-close indexes (catalog updates)