Re: Tests for psql \g and \o

From: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>
To: Daniel Verite <daniel(at)manitou-mail(dot)org>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Tests for psql \g and \o
Date: 2022-11-10 04:37:57
Message-ID: Y2yAJW820Mx3iBXQ@paquier.xyz
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Tue, Nov 01, 2022 at 12:42:47PM +0100, Daniel Verite wrote:
> It's a follow up to the discussion at [1]. Since this discussion
> already has a slot in the CF [2] with a committed patch, let's start a
> new separate thread.

+psql_like($node, "SELECT 'one' \\g | cat >$g_file", qr//, "one command \\g");
+my $c1 = slurp_file($g_file);
+like($c1, qr/one/);

Windows may not have an equivalent for "cat", no? Note that psql's
001_basic.pl has no restriction in place for Windows. Perhaps you
could use the same trick as basebackup_to_shell, where GZIP is used to
write some arbitrary data.. Anyway, this has some quoting issues
especially if the file's path has whitespaces? This is located in
File::Temp::tempdir, still it does not sound like a good thing to rely
on this assumption on portability grounds.
--
Michael

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Regina Obe 2022-11-10 04:44:07 RE: Ability to reference other extensions by schema in extension scripts
Previous Message Ajin Cherian 2022-11-10 04:04:49 Re: Support logical replication of DDLs