Re: how to correctly react on exception in pfree function?

From: Julien Rouhaud <rjuju123(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: how to correctly react on exception in pfree function?
Date: 2022-10-13 01:59:17
Message-ID: Y0dw9eB4J0UIdmjr@jrouhaud
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Wed, Oct 12, 2022 at 07:24:53PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> > I had a talk with Julien about the correct handling of an exception raised
> > by pfree function.
>
> > Currently, this exception (elog(ERROR, "could not find block containing
> > chunk %p", chunk);) is not specially handled ever.
>
> There are hundreds, if not thousands, of "shouldn't ever happen" elogs
> in Postgres. We don't make any attempt to trap any of them. Why do
> you think this one should be different?

Because session variables are allocated in a persistent memory context, so
there's a code doing something like this to implement LET variable:

[...]
oldctxt = MemoryContextSwitchTo(SomePersistentContext);
newval = palloc(...);
MemoryContextSwitchTo(oldctxt);
/* No error should happen after that point or we leak memory */
pfree(var->val);
var->val = newval;
return;

Any error thrown in pfree would mean leaking memory forever in that backend.

Is it ok to leak memory in such should-not-happen case or should there be some
safeguard?

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2022-10-13 02:34:29 Re: how to correctly react on exception in pfree function?
Previous Message Michael Paquier 2022-10-13 01:24:46 Re: Issue in GIN fast-insert: XLogBeginInsert + Read/LockBuffer ordering