Re: Reduce timing overhead of EXPLAIN ANALYZE using rdtsc?

From: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>
To: Ibrar Ahmed <ibrar(dot)ahmad(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Maciek Sakrejda <m(dot)sakrejda(at)gmail(dot)com>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Lukas Fittl <lukas(at)fittl(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Reduce timing overhead of EXPLAIN ANALYZE using rdtsc?
Date: 2022-10-12 08:33:42
Message-ID: Y0Z75kh0WNcb5u3j@paquier.xyz
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Tue, Sep 06, 2022 at 11:32:18AM +0500, Ibrar Ahmed wrote:
> Hunk #5 succeeded at 147 with fuzz 2 (offset -3 lines).
> Hunk #6 FAILED at 170.
> Hunk #7 succeeded at 165 (offset -69 lines).
> 2 out of 7 hunks FAILED -- saving rejects to file
> src/include/portability/instr_time.h.rej
> patching file src/tools/msvc/Mkvcbuild.pm

No rebased version has been sent since this update, so this patch has
been marked as RwF.
--
Michael

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message tachikake.ayaki@fujitsu.com 2022-10-12 08:33:43 Fix wrong syntax about CREATE_REPLICATION_SLOT
Previous Message Amit Kapila 2022-10-12 08:17:17 Re: create subscription - improved warning message