| From: | Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz> |
|---|---|
| To: | Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Dilip Kumar <dilipbalaut(at)gmail(dot)com>, "Ryo Matsumura (Fujitsu)" <matsumura(dot)ryo(at)fujitsu(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: DDL result is lost by CREATE DATABASE with WAL_LOG strategy |
| Date: | 2023-02-22 03:30:20 |
| Message-ID: | Y/WMTGh070EHHrjv@paquier.xyz |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, Feb 21, 2023 at 10:00:11AM -0800, Nathan Bossart wrote:
> What is the purpose of testing it without the checkpoint?
Perhaps none, I was wondering whether it would be worth testing that
with the flush phase, but perhaps that's just extra cycles wasted at
this point.
> Other than that
> question, the patch looks reasonable to me.
Okay, applied and backpatched with a minimal test set, then. I have
kept the tweaks I did to the tests with extra comments.
--
Michael
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Justin Pryzby | 2023-02-22 04:09:37 | Re: pg_stat_bgwriter.buffers_backend is pretty meaningless (and more?) |
| Previous Message | Kyotaro Horiguchi | 2023-02-22 03:07:06 | Re: "out of relcache_callback_list slots" after multiple calls to pg_logical_slot_get_binary_changes |