Re: Commitfest Manager

From: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Greg Stark <stark(at)mit(dot)edu>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Commitfest Manager
Date: 2023-02-22 07:00:06
Message-ID: Y/W9dtgFvCz8GOib@paquier.xyz
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Tue, Feb 21, 2023 at 02:13:08PM -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
> Greg Stark <stark(at)mit(dot)edu> writes:
>> On Tue, 21 Feb 2023 at 12:29, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
>>> Greg Stark <stark(at)mit(dot)edu> writes:
>>> We've generally thought that the manager for the last CF of a cycle
>>> needs to be someone with experience.
>
>> Hm. Was that in response to the first paragraph or the second? :)
>
> The first ;-). Sorry if I wasn't clear.

The last CF is the most sensitive one as the feature freeze would
happen just around the beginning of April, so the CFM has a bit more
pressure in taking the correct decisions, if need be.

FYI, I'd prefer spend cycles at patches that could make the cut,
rather than doing the classification of the whole.
--
Michael

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andrey Chudnovsky 2023-02-22 07:00:46 Re: [PoC] Federated Authn/z with OAUTHBEARER
Previous Message Michael Paquier 2023-02-22 06:47:50 Re: We shouldn't signal process groups with SIGQUIT