Re: gokiburi versus the back branches

From: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: gokiburi versus the back branches
Date: 2023-02-06 23:35:09
Message-ID: Y+GOrVw7I6pAsWBJ@paquier.xyz
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Mon, Feb 06, 2023 at 06:27:50PM -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
> Is it time to back-patch that commit? The alternative would be
> to run the animal with an ASLR-disabling environment variable.
> On the whole I think testing that f3e78069d works is more
> useful than working around lack of it.

Yes, this is my intention as of this message from last week, once this
week's release is tagged:
https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/Y9sMhxo51HRXAmtu@paquier.xyz

Thanks,
--
Michael

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andres Freund 2023-02-06 23:42:38 Re: Temporary tables versus wraparound... again
Previous Message Tom Lane 2023-02-06 23:27:50 gokiburi versus the back branches