Re: Weird failure with latches in curculio on v15

From: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>
To: Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)gmail(dot)com>, Fujii Masao <fujii(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Postgres hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Weird failure with latches in curculio on v15
Date: 2023-02-05 23:36:36
Message-ID: Y+A9hGy0ck0zuiiE@paquier.xyz
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Sun, Feb 05, 2023 at 09:49:57AM +0900, Michael Paquier wrote:
> Yes, at this stage a revert of the refactoring with shell_restore.c is
> the best path forward.

Done that now, as of 2f6e15a.
--
Michael

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andres Freund 2023-02-05 23:37:23 Re: POC PATCH: copy from ... exceptions to: (was Re: VLDB Features)
Previous Message Corey Huinker 2023-02-05 23:34:28 Re: proposal: psql: psql variable BACKEND_PID