| From: | Randolf Richardson <rr(at)8x(dot)ca> |
|---|---|
| To: | pgsql-benchmarks(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: PostgreSQL vs. Oracle vs. Microsoft |
| Date: | 2005-01-20 16:42:34 |
| Message-ID: | Xns95E45A568FE83rr8xca@200.46.204.72 |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-benchmarks |
"tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us (Tom Lane)" wrote in pgsql.benchmarks:
> Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:
>> Michael Dean wrote:
>>
>>> Also keep in mind that CA released Ingre (forerunner to Postgre), IBM
>>> released the improved code from Informix, and Borland firebird. So
>>
>> What source code has IBM released?
>
> Cloudscape, a pure-Java SQL database (though I'm not sure that that's
> what Michael meant).
Interesting. Is it also free?
I've always thought that HSQLDB would be a good enough free 100% Java
database engine for very small stand-alone projects. Does CloudScape fit
into this realm, or would you consider it to be a higher grade?
HSQLDB - 100% Java database
http://hsqldb.sourceforge.net/
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Randolf Richardson | 2005-01-20 16:43:05 | Re: PostgreSQL vs. Oracle vs. Microsoft |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2005-01-14 16:03:43 | Re: PostgreSQL vs. Oracle vs. Microsoft |