Re: 3rd RFD: comp.databases.postgresql (was: comp.databases.postgresql.*)

From: Woodchuck Bill <bwr607(at)hotmail(dot)com>
To: pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: 3rd RFD: comp.databases.postgresql (was: comp.databases.postgresql.*)
Date: 2004-12-03 20:34:36
Message-ID: Xns95B49E671C85Ebswr607h4@130.133.1.4
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

David Harmon <source(at)netcom(dot)com> wrote in
news:41c44692(dot)42645781(at)news(dot)west(dot)earthlink(dot)net:

> On Fri, 3 Dec 2004 00:29:40 +0000 (UTC) in news.groups, Marc G.
> Fournier From: <scrappy(at)hub(dot)org> wrote,
>>The pgsql.* hierarchy is a not a private one, it is a public one
>>carried by several of the large usenet servers.
>
> What are the rules for creating new groups in pgsgl.*?
>
>

Fiat-only by Marc. ;-)

--
Bill

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Peter Eisentraut 2004-12-03 20:40:40 Re: Older Windows versions
Previous Message Woodchuck Bill 2004-12-03 20:32:39 Re: 3rd RFD: comp.databases.postgresql