Re: PGSQL: The Gateway will be kept.

Andrew - Supernews <andrew+nonews(at)supernews(dot)com> wrote in
news:slrncqmv9u(dot)2kf6(dot)andrew+nonews(at)trinity(dot)supernews(dot)net:

> On 2004-11-29, Russ Allbery <rra(at)stanford(dot)edu> wrote:
>> Marc G Fournier From: <scrappy(at)hub(dot)org> writes:
>>> Stanford is now carrying the groups ... Russ got me to fix a problem
>>> with my checkgroups message to deal with how INN works with them,
>>> and I just re-issued it ...
>>
>> They will also be in the ISC list after the next archive push.
>
> What problem was this? If my own checkgroups processor is more
> tolerant than INN's, I want to know why...
>

The pgsql.* groups are now on the ISC list..

ftp://ftp.isc.org/pub/usenet/CONFIG/newsgroups

--
Bill