Re: Important Info on comp.databases.postgresql.general

From: Woodchuck Bill <bwr607(at)hotmail(dot)com>
To: pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Important Info on comp.databases.postgresql.general
Date: 2004-11-09 20:36:47
Message-ID: Xns959C804EC266Abswr607h4@130.133.1.4
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

ru(dot)igarashi(at)usask(dot)ca wrote in news:cmr97f$t29$1(at)tribune(dot)usask(dot)ca:

> Who's being abused here? Russ & Co.? By their own admission, no.
> The Big-8? No, the groups don't exist in the Big-8? The existing
> readers? No, they can read the group. The rest of the world? No
> more so than those that don't have groups specifically for their
> pet interests, which as far as we are concerned is not sufficient
> harm to act upon. The Big-8 process is partly predicated on only
> providing groups for those with sufficient numbers, and since
> the latter has not been established, there's no such harm. Even
> then, if the CFV results in a pass, everyone that cares benefits,
> and if the CFV results in a failure, the rest of the world doesn't
> matter (until they can build up sufficient numbers to pass the
> next time).

OK, so you think it is acceptable for anyone to create as many Big-8 rogue
groups as they like? Some servers will carry the groups, others will not.
There should be no accountability for someone doing this. There is nothing
wrong with it.

--
Bill

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message John Stanley 2004-11-09 20:41:31 Re: Important Info on comp.databases.postgresql.general
Previous Message Greg Stark 2004-11-09 20:30:39 Re: server auto-restarts and ipcs