Re: Re: [JDBC] New backend functions?

From: Ned Wolpert <ned(dot)wolpert(at)knowledgenet(dot)com>
To: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
Cc: "pgsql-jdbc(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-jdbc(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Re: [JDBC] New backend functions?
Date: 2001-08-24 19:50:41
Message-ID: XFMail.20010824125041.ned.wolpert@knowledgenet.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers pgsql-jdbc

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

last_oid() works for me. I have no specific concern on the exact name, just
the functionality. (Call it fred() if you like. :-)

On 24-Aug-2001 Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> Ned Wolpert writes:
>
>> Sounds like there aren't objections to my requested function,
>> get_last_returned_oid(). I'm going to work on the function call for
>> postgres this weekend.
>
> Please don't name functions get_*. All functions "get" something.
>
> Btw., if you call get_last_returned_oid() and then call it again, do you
> get the "last returned oid" returned by get_last_returned_oid? The
> "returned" needs to be revised. last_oid should be sufficient.
>
> --
> Peter Eisentraut peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net http://funkturm.homeip.net/~peter

Virtually,
Ned Wolpert <ned(dot)wolpert(at)knowledgenet(dot)com>

D08C2F45: 28E7 56CB 58AC C622 5A51 3C42 8B2B 2739 D08C 2F45
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org

iD8DBQE7hrARiysnOdCML0URAtv/AJ9UmsbpbA4M6VVOYD90LMrV0FelTwCcCo/r
+aMk4VQ11xWYktgbBWCyOM0=
=qQry
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Peter Eisentraut 2001-08-24 19:51:23 Re: Re: [JDBC] New backend functions?
Previous Message Peter Eisentraut 2001-08-24 19:44:26 Re: JDBC changes for 7.2... some questions...

Browse pgsql-jdbc by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Peter Eisentraut 2001-08-24 19:51:23 Re: Re: [JDBC] New backend functions?
Previous Message Peter Eisentraut 2001-08-24 19:44:26 Re: JDBC changes for 7.2... some questions...