| From: | Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> |
|---|---|
| To: | Ned Wolpert <ned(dot)wolpert(at)knowledgenet(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Rene Pijlman <rpijlman(at)wanadoo(dot)nl>, Barry Lind <barry(at)xythos(dot)com>, <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, "pgsql-jdbc(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-jdbc(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Re: [JDBC] New backend functions? |
| Date: | 2001-08-24 19:51:23 |
| Message-ID: | Pine.LNX.4.30.0108242144430.677-100000@peter.localdomain |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-jdbc |
Ned Wolpert writes:
> Sounds like there aren't objections to my requested function,
> get_last_returned_oid(). I'm going to work on the function call for
> postgres this weekend.
Please don't name functions get_*. All functions "get" something.
Btw., if you call get_last_returned_oid() and then call it again, do you
get the "last returned oid" returned by get_last_returned_oid? The
"returned" needs to be revised. last_oid should be sufficient.
--
Peter Eisentraut peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net http://funkturm.homeip.net/~peter
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Ned Wolpert | 2001-08-24 19:53:55 | Re: JDBC changes for 7.2... some questions... |
| Previous Message | Ned Wolpert | 2001-08-24 19:50:41 | Re: Re: [JDBC] New backend functions? |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Ned Wolpert | 2001-08-24 19:53:55 | Re: JDBC changes for 7.2... some questions... |
| Previous Message | Ned Wolpert | 2001-08-24 19:50:41 | Re: Re: [JDBC] New backend functions? |