| From: | Ned Wolpert <ned(dot)wolpert(at)knowledgenet(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | "pgsql-jdbc(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-jdbc(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: JDBC changes for 7.2... some questions... |
| Date: | 2001-08-21 21:37:05 |
| Message-ID: | XFMail.20010821143705.ned.wolpert@knowledgenet.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-jdbc |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
> it should interact with ON INSERT rules for views. Search the pghackers
> mailing list archives for details. At this point I think it's probably
Ugh... a quick search shows me asking this same thing in May, when the 'big
TODO' list was being commented on. Now that I remember, I thought that the
RETURNING clause was being implemented. I didn't realize there wasn't
agreement on it.
I need to pay more attention to what I write. :-)
Virtually,
Ned Wolpert <ned(dot)wolpert(at)knowledgenet(dot)com>
D08C2F45: 28E7 56CB 58AC C622 5A51 3C42 8B2B 2739 D08C 2F45
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org
iD8DBQE7gtSBiysnOdCML0URAtXNAJ4+W3AgpEk5QZM5IKCFFMQ2tGP5UQCeM1Lx
TXQw4pL4ew65B1iH+EfmZhk=
=Ho0k
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Jan Wieck | 2001-08-21 21:47:44 | Signals blocked during auth |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2001-08-21 21:31:55 | Re: JDBC changes for 7.2... some questions... |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Mike Finn | 2001-08-21 21:41:22 | Comparing fixed precision to floating |
| Previous Message | Mitch Vincent | 2001-08-21 21:34:32 | Re: Data types |