Re: Teach pg_upgrade test to honor NO_TEMP_INSTALL

From: Daniel Gustafsson <daniel(at)yesql(dot)se>
To: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(dot)dunstan(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Cc: PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Teach pg_upgrade test to honor NO_TEMP_INSTALL
Date: 2019-03-30 21:08:48
Message-ID: XATiR28aP7rH7F9ogFyYY2Sixzj42G4hH_9bbURfCE2d80RmZH0_NEuvy1v0zpEg2ZzZzB29XRG5l7R32JLeRb9wjln6IjAP8hNwVkFhxWw=@yesql.se
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Saturday, March 30, 2019 9:42 PM, Andrew Dunstan <andrew(dot)dunstan(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> wrote:

> On some machines (cough Mingw cough) installs are very slow. We've
> ameliorated this by allowing temp installs to be reused, but the
> pg_upgrade Makefile never got the message. Here's a patch that does
> that. I'd like to backpatch it, at least to 9.5 where we switched the
> pg_upgrade location. The risk seems appropriately low and it only
> affects our test regime.

While I haven't tried the patch (yet), reading it it makes sense, so +1
on the fix. Nice catch!

cheers ./daniel

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Thomas Munro 2019-03-30 21:33:12 Re: pgsql: Compute XID horizon for page level index vacuum on primary.
Previous Message Stephen Frost 2019-03-30 20:58:37 Re: Compressed TOAST Slicing