Re: SELECT INTO deprecation

From: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>
To: Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
Cc: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: SELECT INTO deprecation
Date: 2020-12-17 01:30:17
Message-ID: X9q0qXzF7c+clssU@paquier.xyz
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Wed, Dec 16, 2020 at 06:07:08PM +0100, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> Right, we would very likely not add it now. But it doesn't seem to cause a
> lot of ongoing maintenance burden, so if there is a use case, it's not
> unreasonable to keep it around. I have no other motive here, I was just
> curious.

From the point of view of the code, this would simplify the grammar
rules of SELECT, which is a good thing. And this would also simplify
some code in the rewriter where we create some CreateTableAsStmt
on-the-fly where an IntoClause is specified, but my take is that this
is not really a burden when it comes to long-term maintenance. And
the git history tells, at least it seems to me so, that this is not
manipulated much.
--
Michael

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Ajin Cherian 2020-12-17 01:32:25 Re: [HACKERS] logical decoding of two-phase transactions
Previous Message Justin Pryzby 2020-12-17 01:28:31 [PATCH] nbtree: Do not show debugmessage if deduplication is disabled