Re: Proposed patch for key managment

From: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>
To: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
Cc: Masahiko Sawada <masahiko(dot)sawada(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Proposed patch for key managment
Date: 2020-12-07 02:03:30
Message-ID: X82Nclm24KrB0S9I@paquier.xyz
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Sat, Dec 05, 2020 at 10:42:05AM -0500, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> On Sat, Dec 5, 2020 at 09:54:33PM +0900, Michael Paquier wrote:
>> On Fri, Dec 04, 2020 at 10:52:29PM -0500, Bruce Momjian wrote:
>>> if (state->evpctx == NULL)
>>> {
>>> - explicit_bzero(state, sizeof(pg_cryptohash_state));
>>> - explicit_bzero(ctx, sizeof(pg_cryptohash_ctx));
>>> #ifndef FRONTEND
>>> ereport(ERROR,
>>> (errcode(ERRCODE_OUT_OF_MEMORY),
>>
>> And this original position is IMO more correct.
>
> Do we even need them?

That's the intention to clean up things in a consistent way.
--
Michael

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Michael Paquier 2020-12-07 02:22:01 Re: A few new options for CHECKPOINT
Previous Message Zhihong Yu 2020-12-07 01:25:49 Re: Hybrid Hash/Nested Loop joins and caching results from subplans