| From: | Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz> |
|---|---|
| To: | Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Postgres hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>, Daniel Gustafsson <daniel(at)yesql(dot)se> |
| Subject: | Re: Refactoring HMAC in the core code |
| Date: | 2021-01-08 07:11:53 |
| Message-ID: | X/gFuUE/Z1t6NdO2@paquier.xyz |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Fri, Dec 18, 2020 at 03:46:42PM +0900, Michael Paquier wrote:
> This has been tested on Windows and Linux across all the versions of
> OpenSSL we support on HEAD. I am also attaching a small module called
> hmacfuncs that I used as a way to validate this patch across all the
> versions of OpenSSL and the fallback implementation. As a reference,
> this matches with the results from Wikipedia here:
> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/HMAC#Examples
Please find attached a rebased version. I have simplified the
implementation to use an opaque pointer similar to the cryptohash
part, leading to a large cleanup of the allocation logic for both
implementations, with and without OpenSSL.
--
Michael
| Attachment | Content-Type | Size |
|---|---|---|
| v3-0001-Refactor-HMAC-implementations.patch | text/x-diff | 36.4 KB |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Simon Riggs | 2021-01-08 07:13:40 | Re: WIP: System Versioned Temporal Table |
| Previous Message | Antonin Houska | 2021-01-08 06:53:45 | Re: Parallel INSERT (INTO ... SELECT ...) |