Re: [DOC] Document concurrent index builds waiting on each other

From: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>
To: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org>
Cc: James Coleman <jtc331(at)gmail(dot)com>, David Johnston <david(dot)g(dot)johnston(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Developers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>
Subject: Re: [DOC] Document concurrent index builds waiting on each other
Date: 2021-01-13 05:58:02
Message-ID: X/6L6hX95eOqN/oL@paquier.xyz
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Tue, Jan 12, 2021 at 04:51:39PM -0300, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> I looked into this again, and I didn't like what I had added to
> maintenance.sgml at all. It seems out of place where I put it; and I
> couldn't find any great spots. Going back to your original proposal,
> what about something like this? It's just one more para in the "notes"
> section in CREATE INDEX and REINDEX pages, without any additions to the
> VACUUM pages.

+1.
--
Michael

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Amit Kapila 2021-01-13 05:59:20 Re: Logical Replication - behavior of ALTER PUBLICATION .. DROP TABLE and ALTER SUBSCRIPTION .. REFRESH PUBLICATION
Previous Message Peter Smith 2021-01-13 05:47:58 Re: Single transaction in the tablesync worker?