Re: BUG #16780: Inconsistent recovery_target_xid handling across platforms

From: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>
To: exclusion(at)gmail(dot)com, pgsql-bugs(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: BUG #16780: Inconsistent recovery_target_xid handling across platforms
Date: 2020-12-21 07:13:17
Message-ID: X+BLDQOGr4V5oeBz@paquier.xyz
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-bugs

On Fri, Dec 18, 2020 at 10:00:00AM +0000, PG Bug reporting form wrote:
> So on Windows the recovery_target_xid parameter doesn't accept 64-bit
> value.
> As I see in check_recovery_target_xid() the strtoul() function is used to
> check/convert the input value, that is later stored into 32-bit variable.
> Thus, on platforms where unsigned long is 32-bit wide, you can't specify a
> result of pg_current_xact_id() as recovery_target_xid, while on platforms
> where unsigned long is 64-bit, you can, but high 32 bits are just ignored.

In order to make the experience consistent across all platforms, we
can use pg_strtouint64() for the GUC parsing. I agree that ignoring
the high bits can be confusing as recovery would stop once a XID
matches with a modulo of UINT32_MAX, but beginning to issue an error
on platforms where unsigned long is 8 bytes could also break existing
tools. At the same time, WAL record headers and 2PC state data only
use 32-bit XIDs, so ignoring the high bits changes nothing at
recovery (XIDs don't go across more than one epoch in the WAL stream
AFAIK). In short, I agree that there is room for improvement here and
that we should just allow the case to work by replacing the use of
strtoul() to pg_strtouint64(). I am ready to bet that a lot of users
setting a target XID rely on the return result of txid_current() or
pg_current_xact_id() similarly to the test failing here. And once the
epoch increments, the problems begin.

Thoughts?
--
Michael

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-bugs by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andrey Borodin 2020-12-21 07:24:55 Re: CREATE INDEX CONCURRENTLY does not index prepared xact's data
Previous Message Michael Paquier 2020-12-21 05:40:03 Re: CREATE INDEX CONCURRENTLY does not index prepared xact's data