Covering + unique indexes

From: Andreas Joseph Krogh <andreas(at)visena(dot)com>
To: "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Covering + unique indexes
Date: 2016-04-09 04:31:56
Message-ID: VisenaEmail.a8.f1f66bc2d422e810.153f9484d9a@tc7-visena
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Any reason $subject didn't make it (commited but reverted)?
 
This is a great feature and lots of work seems to have been put into this
patch along with quite some reviewing. It would be nice to know why -hackers
think it's not ready for 9.6.
 
Thanks.
 
-- Andreas Joseph Krogh

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2016-04-09 04:34:39 Re: Covering + unique indexes
Previous Message Tom Lane 2016-04-09 03:32:50 Re: Support for N synchronous standby servers - take 2