Re: CHECK Constraint Deferrable

From: Andreas Joseph Krogh <andreas(at)visena(dot)com>
To: Dilip Kumar <dilipbalaut(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Himanshu Upadhyaya <upadhyaya(dot)himanshu(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: CHECK Constraint Deferrable
Date: 2023-10-03 00:06:00
Message-ID: VisenaEmail.61b.53e58ccb717c3e7c.18af2d80969@origo02.app.internal.visena.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

På fredag 07. juli 2023 kl. 13:50:44, skrev Dilip Kumar <dilipbalaut(at)gmail(dot)com
<mailto:dilipbalaut(at)gmail(dot)com>>:
On Wed, Jul 5, 2023 at 3:08 PM Himanshu Upadhyaya
<upadhyaya(dot)himanshu(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> Currently, there is no support for CHECK constraint DEFERRABLE in a create
table statement.
> SQL standard specifies that CHECK constraint can be defined as DEFERRABLE.

I think this is a valid argument that this is part of SQL standard so
it would be good addition to PostgreSQL. So +1 for the feature.

But I am wondering whether there are some real-world use cases for
deferred CHECK/NOT NULL constraints? I mean like for foreign key
constraints if there is a cyclic dependency between two tables then
deferring the constraint is the simplest way to insert without error.

The real-world use case, at least for me, is when using an ORM. For large
object-graphs ORMs have a tendency to INSERT first with NULLs then UPDATE the
“NOT NULLs” later.

“Rewrite the ORM” is not an option for most of us…

--

Andreas Joseph Krogh

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2023-10-03 00:08:37 Re: CHECK Constraint Deferrable
Previous Message Michael Paquier 2023-10-02 23:44:35 Re: Replace (stat(<file>))[7] in TAP tests with -s