Re: [EXT] Re: Accessing composite type elements

From: Garfield Lewis <garfield(dot)lewis(at)lzlabs(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: "pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [EXT] Re: Accessing composite type elements
Date: 2022-06-02 17:05:35
Message-ID: VI1PR0502MB3981C443BA7DCFEA0D6956B7E3DE9@VI1PR0502MB3981.eurprd05.prod.outlook.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

> Binary representations are not too well documented :-(. However,
> looking at record_send() helps here.

will have a look…

> Right, with the additional proviso that -1 "length" indicates a null
> field value.

Thx, Tom… never thought the null field…

--
Regards,
Garfield A. Lewis

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Jeff Janes 2022-06-02 19:44:00 Re: unoptimized nested loops
Previous Message Tom Lane 2022-06-02 16:23:45 Re: Accessing composite type elements