| From: | Piotr Stefaniak <postgres(at)piotr-stefaniak(dot)me> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: pgindent (was Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Preventive maintenance in advance of pgindent run.) |
| Date: | 2017-06-13 21:13:12 |
| Message-ID: | VI1PR03MB11994C5BB7B21EEF96DBF84AF2C20@VI1PR03MB1199.eurprd03.prod.outlook.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-committers pgsql-hackers |
On 2017-06-13 22:23, Tom Lane wrote:
> I could not find any places where reverting this change made the
> results worse, so I'm unclear on why you made it.
I must admit I'm a bit confused about why it's not fixed yet, but I'll
have to analyze that later this week. But the idea was to convince
indent that the following is not a declaration and therefore it
shouldn't be formatted as such:
typedef void (*voidptr) (int *);
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2017-06-13 21:18:01 | Re: pgindent (was Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Preventive maintenance in advance of pgindent run.) |
| Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2017-06-13 21:12:13 | Re: pgindent (was Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Preventive maintenance in advance of pgindent run.) |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Jeevan Ladhe | 2017-06-13 21:13:18 | Re: fix possible optimizations in ATExecAttachPartition() |
| Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2017-06-13 21:12:13 | Re: pgindent (was Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Preventive maintenance in advance of pgindent run.) |