| From: | Kacper Kuras <kacperkuras(at)hotmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Laurenz Albe <laurenz(dot)albe(at)cybertec(dot)at>, "pgsql-docs(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-docs(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>, Daniel Gustafsson <daniel(at)yesql(dot)se> |
| Subject: | Re: E.6.3.2.1. Constraints |
| Date: | 2026-10-03 18:43:15 |
| Message-ID: | VI0P193MB311183D9F1D544E66D04BE41BF882@VI0P193MB3111.EURP193.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-docs |
> My question here is whether error code changes are incompatibilities
> worthy of being mentioned in the release notes, and if committers
> don't mention this in the commit message, how would I find them when
> creating the release notes?
The 18 notes already list one SQLSTATE change, cd838e200 for XML
errors, so leaving out 086c84b23 makes them inconsistent: both change
what code an application gets for the same error.
I can see why it was missed, though. The commit message presents it
as following the standard rather than as a behavior change, and
nothing in errcodes.txt changed: cd838e200 added new codes there,
while 086c84b23 started using 23001, which had been defined but unused
since 2003 (7.4).
So I think it belongs next to cd838e200 in the version 18 notes (it
went into 18.0, not 19). The general question is a good one for
hackers, but could this case be handled on its own?
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | David Rowley | 2026-10-05 01:40:48 | Re: E.6.3.2.1. Constraints |
| Previous Message | Matemática A3K | 2026-10-02 15:23:56 | Re: Improve "3.6. Inheritance" tutorial |